# Download The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Second by Ross L. Prentice John D. Kalbfleisch PDF

By Ross L. Prentice John D. Kalbfleisch

Content material:
Chapter 2 Failure Time versions (pages 31–51):
Chapter three Inference in Parametric types and comparable issues (pages 52–94):
Chapter four Relative possibility (Cox) Regression versions (pages 95–147):
Chapter five Counting methods and Asymptotic thought (pages 148–192):
Chapter 6 chance building and additional effects (pages 193–217):
Chapter 7 Rank Regression and the speeded up Failure Time version (pages 218–246):
Chapter eight Competing dangers and Multistate versions (pages 247–277):
Chapter nine Modeling and research of Recurrent occasion information (pages 278–301):
Chapter 10 research of Correlated Failure Time info (pages 302–327):
Chapter eleven extra Failure Time info subject matters (pages 328–374):

Similar analysis books

Extra resources for The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Second Edition

Example text

21) and corresponding variances obtained within each of the independent strata. 23) typically has an asymptotic χ distribution. It should be noted that this test will be most sensitive to differences among the ρ + 1 treatment groups that are similar across the strata. Examination of the individual log-rank tests in each of the strata can also provide some insights into possible treatment by strata interactions. This method can provide a valuable means of initial analysis and presentation for many data sets.

U) = N(u) — N(u~). 5. {u) —» oo for all u € (0, fl as η —» oo, it is shown that A(r) ->A(f) and [Λ( )-Λ(/)]/ν(/) ^Λ'(0,1), α 5 ί where —» and —> indicate convergence in probability and convergence in distribution, respectively. 5, where items are placed on test in the ith group at time 0, and let Nu(t),t > 0 be the counting process for the number of failures observed in (0, t] for the /th individual in the ith group, / = 1 , . . , πιο; i — 0 , . . ,p. The corresponding at risk processes are Yn{t), and again we assume independent censoring.

26), however, takes the estimates as defined at all /, but constant following the maximum observed time. The former convention is more appropriate in most contexts, but the latter is convenient for some theoretical arguments. (u) = N(u) — N(u~). 5. {u) —» oo for all u € (0, fl as η —» oo, it is shown that A(r) ->A(f) and [Λ( )-Λ(/)]/ν(/) ^Λ'(0,1), α 5 ί where —» and —> indicate convergence in probability and convergence in distribution, respectively. 5, where items are placed on test in the ith group at time 0, and let Nu(t),t > 0 be the counting process for the number of failures observed in (0, t] for the /th individual in the ith group, / = 1 , .